Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access

By A Mystery Man Writer

This study compared outcomes of 874 patients who received either two ProGlide devices or one ProGlide plus one FemoSeal for vascular closure after transfemoral TAVI, finding reduced complications with the combination approach.

Safety and Effectiveness of a Sequential Suture and Plug Vascular Closure Devices Technique for Large-Bore Access Closure after Percutaneous Endovascular Aneurysm Repair - ScienceDirect

Estrategias de Hemostasia del Sitio de Acceso Vascular en el TAVI - CACI

PDF) Long-Term Evolution of Percutaneous Groin Access in Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: A Study of the Sequential Suture and Plug Vascular Closure Devices Technique

Closure Devices - Endovascular Today

Apple iPhone SE (2020), 64 GB - Բջջային հեռախոսներ

Frontiers A 20-year journey in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Evolution to current eminence

Algorithm of access-site femoral arterial closure in percutaneous TAVR.

SOLACI Latin American Society of Interventional Cardiology

Dual Suture Versus Suture and Plug Closure Devices for Large Bore Access Haemostasis During Percutaneous Access Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access haemostasis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Web EIJ223 V19i1 May2023 Filigrane, PDF, Cardiology

Propensity-matched comparison of vascular closure devices after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using MANTA versus ProGlide

Volume 18 Number 10

©2016-2024, doctommy.com, Inc. or its affiliates