By A Mystery Man Writer
A rapid transition away from a fossil-fuel based energy system to a renewable-dependent one would actually save the world trillions of dollars by 2050.
Is it correct that most estimates of the cost of renewable energy sources ignore the matter of intermittentcy? That if this is accounted for, then nuclear becomes the cheaper option? - Quora
Insight: Can We Really Live Without Fossil Fuels, 49% OFF
Fast transition to renewables will save the world $18 trillion, says Oxford study
100% renewables without the 'yes but' – Centre for Climate Safety
100% renewables without the 'yes but' – Centre for Climate Safety
The Three Biggest Myths of the 'Energy Transition' Narrative - Illinois Petroleum Resources Board
Fast transition to renewables will save the world $18 trillion, says Oxford study
Cecilia Bergamasco (@cecberg) / X
Decarbonising the energy system by 2050 could save trillions