Victoria's Secret's Parent Co. and Execs Misled Investors About

Victoria’s Secret’s parent company is facing legal action – not for the bra and underwear designs it is being called out for swiping from ex-employee Jennifer Zuccarini’s label Fleur du Mal – but instead, for allegedly violating federal securities laws by making “materially false and misleading statements and/or failing to disclose adverse information regarding L Brands’ business and prospects,” thereby, causing investors to pay “artificially inflated prices for L Brands common stock,” only to have stock prices fall late last year, and throughout this year, as well. 

Victoria's Secret Plummets as Earnings Report and Guidance Miss

Jennifer Lopez welcomed to family by Casey Affleck

TFL, Author at The Fashion Law - Page 34 of 201

Social Ties Bind CEO, Directors at Victoria's Secret Parent - WSJ

Victoria's Secret Apologizes After Executive's Statements About

Forget Subprime Canadian Real Estate Buyers, Investors Crashed The

Victoria's Secret Parent Company Makes a Comeback

Victoria's Secret Wants $7 Billion Annual Sales Back, Drops “Woke

Angels' in Hell: The Culture of Misogyny Inside Victoria's Secret

Sorry, Victoria's Secret, your 'woke' rebrand failed because it

Sam Altman Is Worth $2 Billion--That Doesn't Include OpenAI

Epstein Flourished as He Forged Bond With Retail Billionaire - WSJ

Exxon chief goes on the offensive as Wall Street sours on ESG