PDF] Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses

Mulligan bypass arch group provided a more controlled and faster tooth movement when compared to active laceback ligature, mainly attributed to the arch wire material and type of force. Objective: To compare the efficiency and effectiveness of Active laceback ligatures with that of Mulligan bypass arch for the amount of retraction, tipping and rotation. Materials and Methods: 20 patients were selected for the study who required upper 1 st premolar extraction for decrowding. All patients were treated with 3M Gemini - MBT 0.022” metal brackets. Patients were divided into 2 groups of 10 patientsin each group. Group 1 was treated with active laceback ligature and group 2 with Mulligan bypass arch. Changes were measured on the cast with a digital vernier caliper. Student ‘t’test was used to determine the mean differences between the two groups for the amount of retraction, tipping and rotation. Results: Significant distal movement of Canine occurred in both the groups. Movement of canine was more in group 2 but distal tipping of canine and distopalatal rotation of the molar was more in group 1. These differences were mainly attributed to the arch wire material and type of force. Conclusion: Mulligan bypass arch group provided a more controlled and faster tooth movement when compared to active laceback ligature.

PDF) Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses

Canine retraction with segmented arches alternative in patients with severe dental crowding: clinical case

PDF) Mulligan's Bypass Arch to Unravel Lower Crowding -A Case Report

Haematologica, Volume 105, Issue 11 by Haematologica - Issuu

PDF] Rapid canine retraction in a Class II bialveolar protrusion case using a lingually extended distraction screw

Evaluation of canine retraction following periodontal distraction using NiTi coil spring and implants – A clinical study - ScienceDirect

PDF) Comparison Between Laceback and Tie-back in Sliding Mechanics (An in vitro study)

T-loop spring vs ricketts maxillary canine retractor in canine retraction efficacy and anchorage loss control: A cone-beam computed tomography study - ScienceDirect

PDF) Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses

PDF) Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses

PDF) The Impact of Canine Retraction on Anchorage Loss in Two Methods of Active Lace Back and NiTi Closed Coil Spring

PDF) Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses