By A Mystery Man Writer
The Navy’s push to retire seven guided-missile cruisers stems from management and planning in its original modernization program that caused exorbitant cost growth, according to service officials. Navy officials have repeatedly cited cost as a reason for the proposed decommissionings, arguing that the service could put the money toward other modernization priorities instead of sustaining the aging platforms. “The cruisers right now and the modernization are running 175 to 200 percent above estimated costs, hundreds of days delay. These ships were intended to have a 30-year service life, we’re out to 35,” Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Mike Gilday told
Changing Surface Warfare Qualifications: Better Incentives Make Deadlier Officers
Shipping Safety: Large vessels
How to Make a Construction Plan: The Ultimate Guide
Mallory Shelbourne, Author at USNI News - Page 27 of 48
Does Sea of Stars Have Missable Content? Does Sea of Stars Have a
Effective Project Scheduling for Shipbuilding Jobs
13 Worst Cruise Lines By Injuries and Assaults - 2023 Picks
The next generation of navigation solutions
USNI News - Page 242 of 852 - Maritime News and Analysis
USS Monterey Archives - USNI News
The Russian Arctic Threat: Consequences of the Ukraine War
British-Spanish team bid to build the Fleet Solid Support ship
QUESTION for any ship experts in here, what is the purpose of the little rudder at the bottom of bigger Imperial ships? Also same question with the big poles jutting from the
VT-86 Strike Segment Planning Guide - Chief of Naval Air Training
Rep. Adam Smith Archives - USNI News